Re: how to interpret formula curvature
From: Virgil (ITSnetNOTcom#virgil_at_COMCAST.com)
Date: 02/11/05
- Next message: david petry: "Mathematics, Pseudomathematics, Artificial Intelligence"
- Previous message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: nlscb: "how to interpret formula curvature"
- Next in thread: Larry Hammick: "Re: how to interpret formula curvature"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 14:19:14 -0700
In article <1108155178.394016.142400@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
"nlscb" <nlscb@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I have a really nasty equation that I needed to use maple to determine
> the curvature where the definition
> of curvature is:
>
> (dy^2/dx^2)/(1+(dy/dx)^2)^(3/2).
>
>
> The final answer is REALLY nasty. I doubt that I could
> solve for it's slope being zero w/o numerical methods.
> It also never equals zero in the range that I am looking
> at (0 to 100). It does have a maximum.
>
> How do I interpret this? I went to wolfram.com, but
> it doesn't really describe what you are supposed to do with
> your results.
If it is continuous and positive and has a single maximum on
0<=x<= 100, then it should look a bit like a section of a parabola
containing the vertex of the parabola, with the maximum curvature
occurring at the "vertex".
If it is in the form y = f(x), then plotting four or more points, with
knowing the general shape, should give you a fair idea of what it looks
like.
If it has more than one maximum, things get more complicated.
- Next message: david petry: "Mathematics, Pseudomathematics, Artificial Intelligence"
- Previous message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: nlscb: "how to interpret formula curvature"
- Next in thread: Larry Hammick: "Re: how to interpret formula curvature"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|