Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: Albert (albertwagner_at_cox.net)
Date: 02/12/05
- Next message: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: |-|erc: "THE HALTING SOLUTION"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 21:21:16 -0600
robert j. kolker wrote:
>
>
> Tony Orlow (aeo6) wrote:
>
>>
>> Let's draw an anology to the mind.
>
>
> You mean brain and nervous system don't you? There is no evidence that
> mind as a separate subrance from the physical stuff of which we are
> made, exists. Slice open a human being and you will find bloody goo.
> Where is the mind?
It is true that mind is not a separate substance. Mind in an
emergent phenomenon dependent on the physical substrate of the
the bloody goo. You destroyed the mind when you killed the goo.
--
"Don't you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the
range of thought? In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally
impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it."
-- George Orwell as Syme in "1984"
- Next message: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: |-|erc: "THE HALTING SOLUTION"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
