Re: Surrogate factoring, integer analysis
tomstdenis_at_gmail.com
Date: 02/12/05
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Existence of mathematical entities (Re: Successor Axiom: on what grounds TF?)"
- Previous message: Neil W Rickert: "Re: Mathematics, Pseudomathematics, Artificial Intelligence"
- In reply to: David Kastrup: "Re: Surrogate factoring, integer analysis"
- Next in thread: David C. Ullrich: "Re: Surrogate factoring, integer analysis"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 12 Feb 2005 10:52:56 -0800
David Kastrup wrote:
> jstevh@msn.com writes:
>
> > It's a puzzle. The theory seems rather easy and straightforward,
> > but no one seems able to get it to work!!!
> >
> > Why? Where's my mistake in the argument above? Why can't I get
> > this damn thing to work?
>
> Because it is too dangerous for national security. They protect
> against this by generating vaccines out of harmless beaten to death
> arguments with some prime ingredients and halluszinogens. Then they
> spike beer with it. Every beer-drinking mathematician wondering too
> much about primes gets affected, causing him to see utter nonsense as
> consistent equations.
See you laugh, but you ever wonder what's in a flu shot and why the
American government didn't want to by spiked^H^H^H^H^H^H extra flu
vaccines from Canada?
...
;-)
Though, I mean Canada is a "third world nation like Mexico"
[paraphrased from one of those debates where he said he wouldn't allow
the import of drugs from Canada and Mexico because the quality of drugs
in third world countries is too low...].
Anyone who voted Demo or Repo in last years election should be ashamed
of themselves. Money is not the be-all people. The "american dream"
literally is just a polite way of saying "standing on someones back".
There is X dollars in the country. You want some huge number B of
dollars. That leaves X-B for the remainder of the citizens. As B
grows the remaining share gets smaller and the more control you can
assert as they basically live for the few dollars they can get.
So to "make a successful business" earning sweet cash money is
basically to say "screw you pedro, I want my share and yours too".
....
Rant...
Tom
Tom
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Existence of mathematical entities (Re: Successor Axiom: on what grounds TF?)"
- Previous message: Neil W Rickert: "Re: Mathematics, Pseudomathematics, Artificial Intelligence"
- In reply to: David Kastrup: "Re: Surrogate factoring, integer analysis"
- Next in thread: David C. Ullrich: "Re: Surrogate factoring, integer analysis"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|