Decoding The Cipher of Genesis

From: Jack Sarfatti (sarfatti_at_pacbell.net)
Date: 02/12/05 

Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 21:09:16 GMT

Decoding The Cipher of Genesis

"quasi-local approach" ... "super-potential, which is a Hamiltonian
boundary term" "screen" of World Hologram i.e. local horizon on (anti)
De Sitter space-time with Hawking radiation? That is the gravity energy
only depends on the horizon surface not on local space volume elements!
3D Space is a holographic image! See p. 16 section E of Brazilian paper.
They go on to get a local representation in the complementary or dual
gauge-force picture that is physically equivalent to the nonlocal
geometrodynamic picture.

The Brazilians Arcos & Pereira (2005) discuss the nonlocality of the
gravity energy in Einstein's geometrodynamic representation with
curvature and no torsion that is Bohr complementary to the gauge force
representation with torsion and no curvature. However the Brazilian
"torsion" should not be confused with Gennady Shipov's torsion. They are
entirely different and different words should be used.

My own macro-quantum theory, for the emergence of Einstein's curvature
in the post-inflationary "Higgs Ocean" (Brian Greene) AKA "multi-layered
multi-colored" cosmic superconducting field (Frank Wilczek) AKA partial
cohering of the pre-inflationary random micro-quantum zero point false
vacuum fluctuations, is more naturally set in the Brazilian gauge force
representation initially although I immediately transform to Einstein's
orthodox geometrodynamical representation as more heuristic for getting
new insights.

Recall that the pre-inflationary unstable false vacuum is a conformal
vacuum without gravitation or inertia admitting only massless
lepto-quark and boson gauge force special relativistic quantum fields.
U(1)SU(2)SU(3) is locally gauged in the false vacuum. No part of the 15
parameter conformal group is locally gauged pre-inflation.

Conformal Group C(4)

= Dilation*(Conformal Boosts to Uniformly Accelerating Hyperbolic
Motion)*(Translations)*(Space-Rotations)*(Inertial Frame Lorentz Boosts)

T4 = normal subgroup of translations generated by Wheeler's "mom-energy"
= Lie algebra {Pa}

O(1,3) = (Space-Rotations)*(Inertial Frame Lorentz Boosts) = Lorentz Group

Lorentz Boost = space-time rotation

real angles of rotation of an extended rigid body have imaginary
extensions that are equivalent to the "rapidities" of the Lorentz boosts.

Spontaneous breaking of O(3) rotation group symmetry in the ground state
of many spinning electrons is ferromagnetism. Ferromagnetism is a
preferred frame of orientation in space without explicit O(3) breaking
terms in the dynamical action.

Similarly, data like Cahill's and Consoli's claiming a preferred Lorentz
inertial frame would, if corroborated, merely mean spontaneous breakdown
of the O(1,3) group in the physical vacuum, particularly its boost
sector. The preferred frame of absolute rest means a set of rapidities
are chosen in a finite region of vacuum just like a set of rotation
angles (only latitude and longitude on the celestial sphere, twist
rotation (torsion field?) about the preferred space direction is another
issue using ALL THREE Euler angles, is chosen in a finite domain of the
ferromagnetic ground state.

Einstein, not knowing about spontaneous symmetry breakdown in 1905,
thought of the space of global inertial frames (pre-GR 1916) as an
affine space without a preferred origin. Lorentz thought of this space
of frames as a vector space with an origin. This is a real experimental
difference, but it is contingent not fundamental. The way the symmetry
breaks in a ferromagnetic domain is contingent like a pimple on one's
nose. Similarly, for Cahill's claim - a small blemish on Einstein's nose
for The Truth! :-)

All dynamics comes from the minimal coupling local gauge principle of
different symmetry groups both internal and external in 4D space-time.
Roger Penrose says extra space dimensions are unstable so let's see if
we can do without them. No supersymmetry needed as yet either since I
predict supersymmetry will not be found in the LHC and also that dark
matter detectors will never click with the right stuff, e.g.
on-mass-shell neutralinos et-al do not exist. These are falsifiable
predictions.

 From Stormy Dirac Sea to Calm Higgs Ocean (Oil upon The Waters of Creation)

Looking only, for now, at the low-energy tail of the false
pre-inflationary conformal vacuum sans gravity and inertia, both
emergent properties, the Dirac negative energy virtual Fermi energy is E
= 0 and the zero point PV virtual electron-positron pairs in a small
thickness of the Fermi surface form virtual bound states fusing into the
zero entropy BEC vacuum condensate "Higgs Ocean" that trigger the
inflation and the emergence of Einstein's gravity along with all rest
masses m and both dark energy and dark matter.

Post-inflation, the Cartan tetrad encoding the important part of the
equivalence principle (EEP) is

eu^a = (Kronecker Delta)u^a + Bu^a

Bu = Bu^aPa/h = (Higgs Ocean Goldstone Phase),u

{Pa} is Lie algebra of T4

i.e. the non-trivial curved intrinsic part - the actual or "real"
gravitational field that is locally equivalent to an inertial field in a
local non-inertial frame of reference, AKA "LNIF"

This is a spontaneous broken locally-gauged U(1)em vacuum symmetry
exactly like in the BCS superconductor where, instead of on-mass-shell
charged 2e electron pairs, we have neutral virtual electron-positron
pairs in an off-mass-shell "bound state". The result is a locally-gauged
T4 dynamical non-trivial tetrad field eu^a emergent from the spontaneous
broken U(1)em vacuum symmetry. The release of binding energy of the
virtual electron-positron pairs powers the Big Bang.

Relevant Pages

  • Decoding The Cipher of Genesis
    ... That is the gravity energy ... Recall that the pre-inflationary unstable false vacuum is a conformal ... Motion)***(Inertial Frame Lorentz Boosts) ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Decoding The Cipher of Genesis
    ... That is the gravity energy ... Recall that the pre-inflationary unstable false vacuum is a conformal ... Motion)***(Inertial Frame Lorentz Boosts) ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Never have so many been so wrong about so much!
    ... Peacock's theorem neglects vacuum coherence entirely and leads to the ... constraints of Einstein's gravity theory completely. ... Laplacian of Gravity Potential Energy Per Unit Test Particle Mass = ... Part A Special Relativity requires w = -1 for ALL zero point quantum ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Never have so many been so wrong about so much!
    ... Peacock's theorem neglects vacuum coherence entirely and leads to the ... constraints of Einstein's gravity theory completely. ... Laplacian of Gravity Potential Energy Per Unit Test Particle Mass = ... Part A Special Relativity requires w = -1 for ALL zero point quantum ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Never have so many been so wrong about so much!
    ... Peacock's theorem neglects vacuum coherence entirely and leads to the ... constraints of Einstein's gravity theory completely. ... Laplacian of Gravity Potential Energy Per Unit Test Particle Mass = ... Part A Special Relativity requires w = -1 for ALL zero point quantum ...
    (sci.math)