Re: I was right, surrogate factoring proof

From: ošin (ošin_at_ragnarok.com)
Date: 02/13/05 

Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 09:44:15 -0800

>> Usually a proof starts of with a theorem. I missed that somehow. What did
>> you prove? That you have a polynomial time factoring algorithm? I missed
>> that somehow too.

> Sounds like *you* missed algebra in school.

State the therem that you think you proved.

> It's a trivially easy proof. End of story.

State the therem that you think you proved.

> Reply again, and so betray.

State the therem that you think you proved.