Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: robert j. kolker (nowhere_at_nowhere.net)
Date: 02/14/05
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Wayne Brown: "Re: My brainstorming and crank label"
- In reply to: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Wolf Kirchmeir: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Wolf Kirchmeir: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 10:57:58 -0500
Albert wrote:
> The best example I can think of, offhand. I spent my summers as a child
> on my grandparents farm and was allowed free reign. Therefore, this poem
> by a master of natural language, for me, actually bursts with meaning .
> It has had a similar effect on hundreds of thousands of readers who did
> not have my exact same experience but who brought experiences of their
> own to its interpretation. It is a paragon of precision exactly because
> it relies on something other than a single literal interpretation.
>
> http://www.bigeye.com/fernhill.htm
I liked one of his other poems -And Death Shall Have No Dominion-.
He was a corker.
Bob Kolker
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Wayne Brown: "Re: My brainstorming and crank label"
- In reply to: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Wolf Kirchmeir: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Wolf Kirchmeir: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
