Re: The condom conundrum
From: Christian Bau (christian.bau_at_cbau.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: 02/17/05
- Next message: Jason: "Re: John Gabriel's Theorem Revisited."
- Previous message: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Surrogate factoring, random is better?"
- In reply to: analytic_at_gmail.com: "The condom conundrum"
- Next in thread: analytic_at_gmail.com: "Re: The condom conundrum"
- Reply: analytic_at_gmail.com: "Re: The condom conundrum"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 23:27:53 +0000
In article <1108680368.092043.150810@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
analytic@gmail.com wrote:
> Someone told me this problem today; I just had to share it:
>
> There are three guys and a lady. They have amongst them only two
> condoms however. How can they reasonably avoid the transmission of
> infection while still each of the guys having full
> vaginal intercourse with the lady?
If she is a lady, they can't.
> (of course, lots of unstated assumptions are made etc., but you'll know
> if you have the answer)
There is an answer, but it is an awful mess.
- Next message: Jason: "Re: John Gabriel's Theorem Revisited."
- Previous message: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Surrogate factoring, random is better?"
- In reply to: analytic_at_gmail.com: "The condom conundrum"
- Next in thread: analytic_at_gmail.com: "Re: The condom conundrum"
- Reply: analytic_at_gmail.com: "Re: The condom conundrum"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
