Re: On Well-Ordering(s) and Sets Dense in the Reals, Infinity
From: Timothy Little (tim-via-n.i.net_at_little-possums.net)
Date: 02/18/05
- Next message: Timothy Little: "Re: S. Petersburg Paradox"
- Previous message: Oscar Lanzi III: "Re: New integer multiplication algorithm"
- In reply to: Piotr Sawuk: "Re: On Well-Ordering(s) and Sets Dense in the Reals, Infinity"
- Next in thread: Ross A. Finlayson: "Re: On Well-Ordering(s) and Sets Dense in the Reals, Infinity"
- Reply: Ross A. Finlayson: "Re: On Well-Ordering(s) and Sets Dense in the Reals, Infinity"
- Reply: Piotr Sawuk: "Re: On Well-Ordering(s) and Sets Dense in the Reals, Infinity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 18 Feb 2005 00:22:29 GMT
Piotr Sawuk wrote:
> theory T with T|-(ZF-infinity) and T|-"all infinite sets are the
> same" with "2 sets are the same iff some invertible mapping does
> exist" (and of course this theory would need to have its own notion
> of "infinite" and maybe even "mapping" would be defined
> differently)...
I think the same definitions of "infinite set" and "mapping" could
apply. (ZF - Infinity + "No set is infinite") would be a perfectly
good example of such a theory.
I think Ross mentioned a theory including ZF without regularity. Such
a theory would need a redefinition of ordered pair. The standard one
uses regularity to prove that {{a},{a,b}} = {{c},{c,d}} iff a=c and
b=d. Something else would need to be found.
- Tim
- Next message: Timothy Little: "Re: S. Petersburg Paradox"
- Previous message: Oscar Lanzi III: "Re: New integer multiplication algorithm"
- In reply to: Piotr Sawuk: "Re: On Well-Ordering(s) and Sets Dense in the Reals, Infinity"
- Next in thread: Ross A. Finlayson: "Re: On Well-Ordering(s) and Sets Dense in the Reals, Infinity"
- Reply: Ross A. Finlayson: "Re: On Well-Ordering(s) and Sets Dense in the Reals, Infinity"
- Reply: Piotr Sawuk: "Re: On Well-Ordering(s) and Sets Dense in the Reals, Infinity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|