Re: Reality testing, sf, random or not?
From: ošin (ošin_at_ragnarok.com)
Date: 02/18/05
- Next message: Jim Spriggs: "Re: Surrogate factoring, random is better?"
- Previous message: Paul Rubin: "Re: Easy test of surrogate factoring"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Reality testing, sf, random or not?"
- Next in thread: mensanator_at_aol.compost: "Re: Reality testing, sf, random or not?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 17:10:24 -0800
> If surrogate factoring is random as they claim, then necessarily
> solutions for Ax will give you random numbers.
No. Nobody said that that I recall. People have said that your algorithm is
no better than random. Pseudo random may have been i bit more correct if we
are talking about real implementations, but nobody said your algorithm would
be a random (or even a good pseudo random) process.
> It will be a perfect random number generator, where you can take an M
> with a known factorization, and use it to get random numbers.
Idiot.
> That shows that surrogate factoring can in fact be made to work.
You have not shown it to be true yet. But lets say it works. The question
becomes how fats does it work? Can you give us some Big O notation on this?
> It's a reality test.
Yes. And so far you have failed that reality test.
> Now algebra is not something that you can wish away...
Apperantly, you are also not something that one just can wish away...
> If someone dies, then you can be convicted of murder for blocking the
> truth.
Can you? Can you site a legal case that set that? Where blocking a
mathematical truth resulted in a murder conviction. James has become a crank
lawer now? And how will cracking RSA result in a death?
> And beyond the law, if it goes badly enough, people will probably just
> kill you, without regard to what the law says.
That would make you so very happy. Idiot!
> And you will take down not only yourselves, but your families, and your
> communities, or even your entire countries, in one of the worst
> debacles in the history of the world.
James the crank historian? Nope. Lots of bigger debacles in the history of
the world.
> It is foretold in most mythologies and religions.
James is now a crank cult leader, a crank lawer, a crank historian, a crank
mathematician!
> And yes, you are the ones, the cursed ones, who destroy the world.
Hey... Ragnarok is here!!!! Party hardy!!! Tear James limb from limb, cause
we all goin' ta hell anyhoooooooo!
- Next message: Jim Spriggs: "Re: Surrogate factoring, random is better?"
- Previous message: Paul Rubin: "Re: Easy test of surrogate factoring"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Reality testing, sf, random or not?"
- Next in thread: mensanator_at_aol.compost: "Re: Reality testing, sf, random or not?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
