Re: John Gabriel's Theorem Revisited.
From: Jason (logamath_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 02/18/05
- Next message: N. Silver: "Re: how to find perfect square factors of a number"
- Previous message: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: The World Wide Wade: "Re: John Gabriel's Theorem Revisited."
- Next in thread: The World Wide Wade: "Re: John Gabriel's Theorem Revisited."
- Reply: The World Wide Wade: "Re: John Gabriel's Theorem Revisited."
- Reply: David C. Ullrich: "Re: John Gabriel's Theorem Revisited."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 17 Feb 2005 18:16:29 -0800
What did I just say about Wade? I think I said he has nothing to
contribute but crap. Well, just read what the fool has written and
judge for yourself.
Enough *** Wade. Pull up your pants and give others a chance to speak.
You have not been able to refute anything you fool! In order to refute
this information, you first need to understand it.
> The limit of difference quotients is precisely what we use in
> analysis to compute a derivative.
No idiot! It is not. And I *** on you and Rudin!! The concept of the
limit of the derivative was around long before Analysis and Rudin. Why,
Archimedes used limits you bumbling idiot!! they were not called such
but that's exactly what they were.
> Why not write Rudin and set him straight once and for all? Send
> him Gabriel's earth-shattering reformulations, tell him to say
> "touch" instead of "intersect", tell him that the derivative of x
> is 0 (hence it's not differentiable), or at the very least ask
> him to include self-referential definitions in the next edition.
Rudin is an idiot because he has helped produce idiots the likes of
you!!
I would prefer that he never writes another book as long as he lives
because he knows absolutely nothing!!
> I have a knack of posting comments you find impossible to refute,
> causing you to go into fits and tantrums and to soil your pants.
> I refuse to pay the laundry bill.
This last comment tells me what kind of a rotten amoeba you are: Let me
see? You are filthy on your person. You probably don't wash your ass
after you ***, why you probably don't even wipe it. Your body odour
causes everyone to flee from you and you look like a pathetic slob or
an emaciated, goggle-faced twit. Your house or apartment is crawling
with cockroaches and your breath probably stinks worse than that of a
snake.
You are a thug and a coward because if you were in my presence, you
would be incontinent just by me looking at you threateningly. What a
loud and useless *** that you are! Go on, if it makes you happy,
continue to post more crap like you have been doing - it's about all a
low-life trash like you will ever amount to.
- Next message: N. Silver: "Re: how to find perfect square factors of a number"
- Previous message: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: The World Wide Wade: "Re: John Gabriel's Theorem Revisited."
- Next in thread: The World Wide Wade: "Re: John Gabriel's Theorem Revisited."
- Reply: The World Wide Wade: "Re: John Gabriel's Theorem Revisited."
- Reply: David C. Ullrich: "Re: John Gabriel's Theorem Revisited."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]