Re: Factoring problem solution
From: *** T. Winter (***.Winter_at_cwi.nl)
Date: 02/18/05
- Next message: Keith A. Lewis: "Re: Blackjack"
- Previous message: flip: "Re: Factoring, sf, and reasonable requests"
- In reply to: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: Factoring problem solution"
- Next in thread: Ad Hominem: "Re: Factoring problem solution"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:39:41 GMT
In article <1108112043.489072.164510@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> "tomstdenis@gmail.com" <tomstdenis@gmail.com> writes:
...
> x^2 - y^2 == 0 (mod N) and x != y then you have a good chance of
> factoring N.
In practise, when x != y, and when N has only two factors, the probability
to obtain non-trivial factors is about 1 in 2. (It gets better when N has
more factors.) That is the reason that MPQS algorithms in general generate
quite a few more basic relations than actually needed. If you have N basic
relations with a factor base of M primes, when N > M you will find (N-M)
(different) relations of the form x^2 - y^2 == 0 (mod N). So getting to
N = M + 100 will almost surely factor the number.
-- *** t. winter, cwi, kruislaan 413, 1098 sj amsterdam, nederland, +31205924131 home: bovenover 215, 1025 jn amsterdam, nederland; http://www.cwi.nl/~***/
- Next message: Keith A. Lewis: "Re: Blackjack"
- Previous message: flip: "Re: Factoring, sf, and reasonable requests"
- In reply to: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: Factoring problem solution"
- Next in thread: Ad Hominem: "Re: Factoring problem solution"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]