Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: Albert (albertwagner_at_cox.net)
Date: 02/19/05
- Next message: ošin: "Re: Math discovery versus math society"
- Previous message: guenther.vonKnakspott_at_gmx.de: "Re: JSH: Still hoping?"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 19:08:49 -0600
robert j. kolker wrote:
>
>
> Allan C Cybulskie wrote:
>
>> And if that is a sensory illusion? And how do you know that it's
>> there when
>> you stop looking at it?
>
>
> Get someone else to look and compare notes. Intersubjective
> corroberation is a standard way of checking the validity of one's
> perceptions.
>
> If n people agree intersubjectively then what are the chances of them
> all having the same delusion?
You obviously didn't pay attention in the last two national
elections.
--
"Don't you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the
range of thought? In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally
impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it."
-- George Orwell as Syme in "1984"
- Next message: ošin: "Re: Math discovery versus math society"
- Previous message: guenther.vonKnakspott_at_gmx.de: "Re: JSH: Still hoping?"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|