Re: Math discovery versus math society
From: ošin (ošin_at_ragnarok.com)
Date: 02/19/05
- Next message: ošin: "Re: Still hoping?"
- Previous message: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Math discovery versus math society"
- Next in thread: Lefty: "Re: Math discovery versus math society"
- Reply: Lefty: "Re: Math discovery versus math society"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 16:10:53 -0800
> Math people just keep claiming it's not important.
Those "math people" are correct.
> They do work, if you can pick a rational Ax.
Hey, I can factor RSA numbers, if I just had a way of picking the factors!
> Supposedly mathematicians care about such things.
Yup, they don't care much.
> I don't know what you'd do, as you're not freaking me, but I re-wrote
> the goddamn paper and sent it to a BIGGER journal.
>
> That journal is at Princeton. The editor in charge of the section that
> has my paper is Andrew Wiles.
Ooooops. I hope that Andrew does not look up any of your old posts where you
said nasty things about his FLT proof being invalid. After all, he is a
mathematician, and according to you social offence would clearly be a big
deal to him. If your paper never gets published at the Annals, I bet that
would be the reason.... you just pissed him off too much.
> So yeah, it's great being me in many ways.
Good... I know that I could not deal with it.
> I say, screw them. I'll outlast them. And someday I'll dance on their
> graves.
James... you are such an uber-idiot.
- Next message: ošin: "Re: Still hoping?"
- Previous message: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Math discovery versus math society"
- Next in thread: Lefty: "Re: Math discovery versus math society"
- Reply: Lefty: "Re: Math discovery versus math society"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|