Re: Existence of mathematical entities (Re: Successor Axiom: on what grounds TF?)
examachine_at_gmail.com
Date: 02/20/05
- Next message: Jason: "Re: Gabriel's Theorem"
- Previous message: David Eather: "Re: Surrogate family"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Existence of mathematical entities (Re: Successor Axiom: on what grounds TF?)"
- Next in thread: Paul Holbach: "Re: Existence of mathematical entities (Re: Successor Axiom: on what grounds TF?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 20 Feb 2005 07:43:15 -0800
robert j. kolker wrote:
> examachine@gmail.com wrote:
> > I'm not going to pay much attention to any non-mechanical theory of
> > mind.
>
> I assume you mean by non-mechanical non-material or non-physical. If
so,
> I concur. I deny the existence of res cogitens.
Yes, I do. However, I fail to see what physical process would be
non-mechanical. The question, rather, is what the true mechanics of the
world is.
Cheers,
-
Eray
- Next message: Jason: "Re: Gabriel's Theorem"
- Previous message: David Eather: "Re: Surrogate family"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Existence of mathematical entities (Re: Successor Axiom: on what grounds TF?)"
- Next in thread: Paul Holbach: "Re: Existence of mathematical entities (Re: Successor Axiom: on what grounds TF?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|