James Harris commits fraud
From: rrattsprintverizonbell (nospam_at_nospam.com)
Date: 02/22/05
- Next message: borges2003xx_at_yahoo.it: "Re: an true information theory"
- Previous message: G. A. Edgar: "Re: An exact 1-D limit challenge - 1"
- Next in thread: Fish! - of Arcadia.: "Re: James Harris commits fraud"
- Reply: Fish! - of Arcadia.: "Re: James Harris commits fraud"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 09:03:51 -0600
============================================================================
<Begin quote from jstevh@msn.com James Harris>
Think about it. Try to find something wrong with it. Consider it
carefully.
It is correct, and once you realize that you are duty bound to inform
the world.
Failure to inform the world is fraud, as some of you are taking
money, and getting prestige based on beliefs that depend on
ignoring the simple refutation here.
I have proven the problem with other techniques, and sci.math'ers
have energetically sought to censor my efforts, like with their
email campaign against an important paper of mine, which also
showed the error.
Things like that email campaign managing to censor a paper that
shows such a huge problem is just a sign of corruption meant to
allow false beliefs to remain, like for mathematicians to keep
teaching young minds things that are false, for their own selfish
needs.
Fraud is not a light thing. Being convicted of fraud can be far
worse for your life than having to face being wrong in your
mathematical research--as you will still have been wrong
mathematically, but on top of that your life can be ruined in
other ways.
Conviction of fraud can mean jail time. It can mean social censor.
It can mean big headlines where mathematicians take "perp walks"
before a jeering public because you people try to wait, hold out,
as if the mathematics will change, as if mathematical proof means
nothing to you, showing more lies from your society.
The mathematical result will not change.
If you understand it is true today, then you know it will be true
tomorrow.
Hiding the truth, even by doing nothing, is fraud.
James Harris
<End quote>
============================================================================
==
Got that? First, you dared us to find something wrong with it.
You asserted with total confidence that it was correct.
Then you accused us of fraud if we ignored your "simple refutation".
Then you pointed out that fraud is a serious crime which can result in
jail time. You fantasized about "social censor" and "big headlines"
and "perp walks before a jeering public".
You said the mathematical result will not change. Now here you
are retracting it.
Were we committing fraud when we pointed out your mistake ?
Were we lying ?
You will quickly forget this happened. That is what you always do.
You make a mistake, then you accuse of us lying or fraud. Then
you find the mistake. Then you forget that you made it.
But you always do remember one thing from these episodes, don't
you? You always retain one great truth. Right?
You always remember that your critics were liars and perpetrators
of fraud!
James Harris = Fraudulant Troll
- Next message: borges2003xx_at_yahoo.it: "Re: an true information theory"
- Previous message: G. A. Edgar: "Re: An exact 1-D limit challenge - 1"
- Next in thread: Fish! - of Arcadia.: "Re: James Harris commits fraud"
- Reply: Fish! - of Arcadia.: "Re: James Harris commits fraud"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
