Re: Chi -squared Fitting problem
From: Bjoern Feuerbacher (feuerbac_at_thphys.uni-heidelberg.de)
Date: 02/22/05
- Next message: mareg_at_mimosa.csv.warwick.ac.uk: "Re: 'Subfinite' numbers"
- Previous message: Mark J. Tilford: "Re: A Bowdlerized Conundrum"
- In reply to: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Chi -squared Fitting problem"
- Next in thread: sean: "Re: Chi -squared Fitting problem"
- Reply: sean: "Re: Chi -squared Fitting problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:26:14 +0100
Bjoern Feuerbacher wrote:
[snip]
> I(t) = Imax * ( fR((t-tmax)/(s(1+z))) + b )
> Imax, tmax, s and b are here four free fit parameters, z is a given
> constant. Let's say z = 0.1, i.e. I do a fit to the formula:
> I(t) = Imax * ( fR((t-tmax)/(0.1 s)) + b)
Ooops. Obvious typo: I meant
> I(t) = Imax * ( fR((t-tmax)/(1.1 s)) + b)
[snip]
Bye,
Bjoern
- Next message: mareg_at_mimosa.csv.warwick.ac.uk: "Re: 'Subfinite' numbers"
- Previous message: Mark J. Tilford: "Re: A Bowdlerized Conundrum"
- In reply to: Bjoern Feuerbacher: "Re: Chi -squared Fitting problem"
- Next in thread: sean: "Re: Chi -squared Fitting problem"
- Reply: sean: "Re: Chi -squared Fitting problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|