Re: struggling proving lattice identity
From: William Elliot (marsh_at_privacy.net)
Date: 02/23/05
- Next message: Ken Pledger: "Re: struggling proving lattice identity"
- Previous message: W. Dale Hall: "Re: Importance of Failure"
- In reply to: mikharakiri_nospaum_at_yahoo.com: "struggling proving lattice identity"
- Next in thread: mikharakiri_nospaum_at_yahoo.com: "Re: struggling proving lattice identity"
- Reply: mikharakiri_nospaum_at_yahoo.com: "Re: struggling proving lattice identity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 19:28:11 -0800
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 mikharakiri_nospaum@yahoo.com wrote:
> a >= c --> a/\(b\/c) >= (a/\b)\/c
>
c <= a ==> a/\b \/ c <= a /\ b\/c
a/\b <= a
c <= a
a/\b \/ c <= a
a/\b <= b <= b\/c
c <= b\/c
a/\b \/ c <= b\/c
a/\b \/ c <= a /\ b\/c
> Assuming that algebraic manipulations with equalities are easier, let's
> rewrite it as:
>
> a/\c=c --> a/\(b\/c)/\((a/\b)\/c) = (a/\b)\/c
>
> and here I'm effectively stuck. I'm unable see how to rearrange terms
> and apply lattice axioms.
>
Looks like you're considering modular lattices.
- Next message: Ken Pledger: "Re: struggling proving lattice identity"
- Previous message: W. Dale Hall: "Re: Importance of Failure"
- In reply to: mikharakiri_nospaum_at_yahoo.com: "struggling proving lattice identity"
- Next in thread: mikharakiri_nospaum_at_yahoo.com: "Re: struggling proving lattice identity"
- Reply: mikharakiri_nospaum_at_yahoo.com: "Re: struggling proving lattice identity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]