Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: robert j. kolker (nowhere_at_nowhere.net)
Date: 02/24/05
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: sean: "Re: Chi -squared Fitting problem"
- In reply to: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:54:56 -0500
Albert wrote:
>
>
> Oh, yes. 'Good approximations' have given us 3.57 uncracked eggs,
> partial pregnancies, 2.5 children, and modern economics.
Those are -averages-, not approximations.
Bob Kolker
>
- Next message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: sean: "Re: Chi -squared Fitting problem"
- In reply to: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
