Re: Back to theory
From: ChumlyDoright (someone_at_jablome.com)
Date: 02/25/05
- Next message: ošin: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- Previous message: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "SF: Back to theory"
- Next in thread: ošin: "Re: Back to theory"
- Reply: ošin: "Re: Back to theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:25:11 -0600
>
> I still can't see why T doesn't provide all of those factors, given the
> equation relating y to its own factor, but there must be some reason,
> or the algorithms I've tried so far would work.
>
> All of this may be of "pure math" interest only, if these equations
> can't be turned into practical algorithms.
>
Many areas of advanced mathematics have solutions that are partial and do
not work over an entire field.
It is like the field is broken up into subsets where particular solutions
work, and fail in the other areas.
Factoring is one of those complicated areas. You probably have a solution
that works over a partial field.
- Next message: ošin: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- Previous message: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "SF: Back to theory"
- Next in thread: ošin: "Re: Back to theory"
- Reply: ošin: "Re: Back to theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|