Re: SF: Back to theory
From: ošin (ošin_at_ragnarok.com)
Date: 02/25/05
- Next message: ošin: "Re: Surrogate factoring explained"
- Previous message: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- Next in thread: C. Bond: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:09:07 -0800
> But I just realized that I can do the same with
>
> yz^2 + Az - j^2 = 0,
>
> to explicitly solve y and z in terms of the factorizations of M and T,
> but, I have the same y, so maybe you can just use the explicit
> equations for y, for each of the factorizations and map them together
> to pull out the factors of M.
>
> If so, the correct algorithm is nothing like what I've been doing.
My Freaking God...
- Next message: ošin: "Re: Surrogate factoring explained"
- Previous message: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- Next in thread: C. Bond: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|