Definition of vector
From: Michael Stueben (michael.stueben_at_fcps.edu)
Date: 02/25/05
- Next message: Robin Chapman: "Re: Sum of 2 Squares in Different Ways = S, a Product of r [r >= 2] number of Primes"
- Previous message: C. Bond: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- Next in thread: Robin Chapman: "Re: Definition of vector"
- Reply: Robin Chapman: "Re: Definition of vector"
- Reply: Dave Seaman: "Re: Definition of vector"
- Reply: Zdislav V. Kovarik: "Re: Definition of vector"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 25 Feb 2005 08:28:44 -0800
Almost every definition of a vector says "a mathematical entity with
magnitude and direction." Yes, but that is NOT what we mean in math and
science. It is silly of me to speak of my car as a vector, even though
it does have magnitude and direction. When a math sci person uses the
word vector he/she means more: A vector that is capable of being added
to and scaled, etc. Hence, shouldn't we be using a phrase like
"Cartesian vector" instead of "vector"? Or is all of this tacitly
understood by the author/speaker and reader/listener?
- Next message: Robin Chapman: "Re: Sum of 2 Squares in Different Ways = S, a Product of r [r >= 2] number of Primes"
- Previous message: C. Bond: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- Next in thread: Robin Chapman: "Re: Definition of vector"
- Reply: Robin Chapman: "Re: Definition of vector"
- Reply: Dave Seaman: "Re: Definition of vector"
- Reply: Zdislav V. Kovarik: "Re: Definition of vector"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|