Re: SF: Back to theory
tomstdenis_at_gmail.com
Date: 02/25/05
- Next message: Leroy Quet: "Re: Multiplying Sub-segments: A Game"
- Previous message: Dan: "A question in topology , please help me"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "SF: Back to theory"
- Next in thread: Lefty: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- Reply: Lefty: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 25 Feb 2005 09:16:41 -0800
jstevh@msn.com wrote:
> I see a lot of negative postings about my ideas, and surrogate
> factoring is getting a lot of bashing, but hey, it's just an idea.
The only one you have to prove things to is yourself.
If you really don't want to co-operate with others [you're choice and I
won't tell you what todo] then why do you care what others think or do?
Do what you want with your life [go free will!] and make peace with
others.
Good luck with your work. I mean it. You've decided to occupy your
time on earth with your math projects and it would [usually] be ideal
and desirable to have a lasting impact. Go do your thing James Harris
and let others do their thing.
Tom
- Next message: Leroy Quet: "Re: Multiplying Sub-segments: A Game"
- Previous message: Dan: "A question in topology , please help me"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "SF: Back to theory"
- Next in thread: Lefty: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- Reply: Lefty: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
