Re: Contractible metric space
From: Timothy Little (tim-via-n.i.net_at_little-possums.net)
Date: 02/25/05
- Next message: Stephen Harris: "Re: an true information theory"
- Previous message: Daniel W. Johnson: "Re: Divisibility by 7 & 13"
- In reply to: Julien Santini: "Contractible metric space"
- Next in thread: Michael Barr: "Re: Contractible metric space"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 25 Feb 2005 22:49:55 GMT
Julien Santini wrote:
> What is meant by "unique"?
There is only one object satisfying the properties. Formally, if we
let P(x) be a predicate corresponding to the properties, then
P(A) and P(B) => A = B.
> What is meant by arc ? (traditionally an arc is a continuous map
> defined on [0,1] right ?)
Almost: that's a path. An arc is more restricted: its function must
be bijective and continuous in both directions. In mathematical
formalism:
f:[0,1] -> S is an arc in M iff S is a subspace of M and f is
bijective, continuous, and has continuous inverse.
> And what about "congruent [...] to a line segment ?"
There exists an distance preserving bijection between an interval of R
(i.e. a line segment) and the arc. Formally:
A subspace S of M is congruent to a line segment iff there exists a,b
in R and f:[a,b] -> S such that f is bijective and for all x,y in [a,b],
d(f(x),f(y)) = |x-y|.
- Tim
- Next message: Stephen Harris: "Re: an true information theory"
- Previous message: Daniel W. Johnson: "Re: Divisibility by 7 & 13"
- In reply to: Julien Santini: "Contractible metric space"
- Next in thread: Michael Barr: "Re: Contractible metric space"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]