Re: SF: Back to theory
From: ošin (ošin_at_ragnarok.com)
Date: 02/26/05
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Tim Peters: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- Next in thread: Tim Peters: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- Reply: Tim Peters: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 09:15:39 -0800
> Despite sometimes-hysterical posts about this point, factoring James's
> T=M^2-j^2 truly isn't hard...
OK... I got your point! Sheeeeeeeesh...
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Tim Peters: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- Next in thread: Tim Peters: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- Reply: Tim Peters: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
