Re: SF: Back to theory
From: Nora Baron (norabaron_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 02/27/05
- Next message: José Carlos Santos: "Re: what does l_2(Z) denote??? thanks"
- Previous message: Nora Baron: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- In reply to: Paul Murray: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- Next in thread: Tim Peters: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- Reply: Tim Peters: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 27 Feb 2005 06:27:30 -0800
Yes - that was my intended point. However to my surprise, some
experiments by Tim Peters in this thread seem to indicate that
factoring T^6 = f * g and letting X = f - g and does significantly
better than chance. The reason is not clear. I think X = f^2 - g^2
may do better still.
Nora B.
- Next message: José Carlos Santos: "Re: what does l_2(Z) denote??? thanks"
- Previous message: Nora Baron: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- In reply to: Paul Murray: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- Next in thread: Tim Peters: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- Reply: Tim Peters: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]