Re: SF: Back to theory

jstevh_at_msn.com
Date: 02/27/05 

Date: 27 Feb 2005 11:16:57 -0800

Nora Baron wrote:
<deleted>

>
> As in many other instances he has his own nonstandard definition
> of 'liar'. A 'liar' is someone who disagrees with James Harris.
>

Sigh. Here's why I call "Nora Baron" a serial liar.

For some years this poster has obsessively replied to my posts, and I
noticed a while back that when I explained ideas out carefully and in
detail in reply, this poster would just ignore the facts, no matter how
often I explained or how carefully I stepped through.

Also, the poster made a Nora Baron post ending with the name "Andrzej"
and there's another sci.math'er who used to obsessively reply to my
posts, ignoring the facts no matter how detailed my replies who used
that name.

When caught, the poster claimed that the male name was the pseudonym
and was being retired, while the "Nora Baron" name is supposedly the
real name, but it is suspiciously a palindromic name.

>>From my perspective the lying about math is what's most important while
the weird sex thing is just that, weird.

AT this point, it's anyone's guess what sex this poster even is, and as
for their mathematical statements, I've found that yes, the "Nora
Baron" poster may say things that are correct up to the point that
telling the truth would mean accepting one of my major conclusions.

So that's why I say the poster is a serial liar. Take your pick, lying
about their sex, or lying about math, there's a lot of lying going on
from that person whomever he or she really is.

James Harris

Quantcast