Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done?
From: Willem (willem_at_stack.nl)
Date: 02/27/05
- Next message: Ignacio Larrosa Caņestro: "Re: triangle formula name (?)"
- Previous message: Wolf Kirchmeir: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Andrew Swallow: "Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done?"
- Next in thread: Dave Rusin: "Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done?"
- Reply: Dave Rusin: "Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 20:52:01 +0000 (UTC)
Andrew wrote:
) Ioannis wrote:
) [snip]
)>> I came up with plenty of ideas, but they were either too complicated or
)>> creating collisions was too likely, that are not easily resolved.
)
) Generate the number by adding 1 to the previous number. First come
) first served. This is possible if you have got a centralised registry.
You missed the bit where centralised registries were disallowed.
SaSW, Willem
--
Disclaimer: I am in no way responsible for any of the statements
made in the above text. For all I know I might be
drugged or something..
No I'm not paranoid. You all think I'm paranoid, don't you !
#EOT
- Next message: Ignacio Larrosa Caņestro: "Re: triangle formula name (?)"
- Previous message: Wolf Kirchmeir: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Andrew Swallow: "Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done?"
- Next in thread: Dave Rusin: "Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done?"
- Reply: Dave Rusin: "Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|