Re: SF: Back to theory
From: Jesse F. Hughes (jesse_at_phiwumbda.org)
Date: 02/27/05
- Next message: Willem: "Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done?"
- Previous message: gerard46: "Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done?"
- In reply to: Nora Baron: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- Next in thread: Nora Baron: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- Reply: Nora Baron: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 21:55:30 +0100
"Nora Baron" <norabaron@hotmail.com> writes:
>> When caught, the poster claimed that the male name was the pseudonym
>> and was being retired, while the "Nora Baron" name is supposedly the
>> real name, but it is suspiciously a palindromic name.
>>
>
> 'Andrzej' was retired. I did not say what the "real name" is, or
> the gender.
What a lame excuse. We're onto you.
For a look at the "real" Andrzej Kolowski, see
http://www.seminolesheriff.org/criminal/trav283.html.
Yep! Nora's right! Andrzej *is* an alias, and so is Nora Baron. The
sordid details are there for everyone to see.
-- Jesse F. Hughes "Of course, my ability to admit my mistakes and correct them is a trait that many of you seem to never have properly appreciated." -- JSH, discussing his 1463rd "proof" of Fermat's Last Theorem.
- Next message: Willem: "Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done?"
- Previous message: gerard46: "Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done?"
- In reply to: Nora Baron: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- Next in thread: Nora Baron: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- Reply: Nora Baron: "Re: SF: Back to theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]