Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: Albert (albertwagner_at_cox.net)
Date: 02/27/05
- Next message: gerard46: "Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done?"
- Previous message: Bill Dubuque: "Re: Largest prime ever just discovered"
- In reply to: Wolf Kirchmeir: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Allan C Cybulskie: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 17:00:17 -0600
Wolf Kirchmeir wrote:
> Albert wrote:
>
>> Neil W Rickert wrote:
>>
>>> "Allan C Cybulskie" <allan.c.cybulskie@yahoo.ca> writes:
>>>
>>>
>>>> The main issue here, though, is what Euclid said about how geometry
>>>> should
>>>> work on curved surfaces. If he assumed flat surfaces -- as others
>>>> in this
>>>> thread have suggested -- then it isn't that his geometry is WRONG,
>>>> but that
>>>> it is INCOMPLETE.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> You seem to be assuming that the notion of "curved surface" is prior
>>> to geometry. Mathematically speaking, it is the other way around.
>>> Incidently, the surface of a cylinder is not curved (in the mathematical
>>> sense of "curved").
>>
>>
>>
>> LOL. Of course, nothing is as it is in a mathematical sense.
>> Apparently, learning mathematics is primarily memorizing a large
>> number of definitions that contradict the common definitions.
>> Mathematical concepts themselves would be easily understood but for
>> the consistently wierd definitions.
>
>
> Then it wouldn't be mathematics. I'd not rely on it at all, in that
> case, since there would be no guarantee that any two people would come
> up with the same results. A bridge built according to your notion of
> mathematics is one I wouldn't cross -- until I'd seen you cross it
> first, that is. :-)
So, it's the wierd definitions of a powerful priesthood that
fascinate you rather than the concepts. That's a shame.
-- "Mercifully free of the ravages of intelligence" -- Time Bandits
- Next message: gerard46: "Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done?"
- Previous message: Bill Dubuque: "Re: Largest prime ever just discovered"
- In reply to: Wolf Kirchmeir: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Allan C Cybulskie: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|