Re: SF: Back to theory

From: Jesse F. Hughes (jesse_at_phiwumbda.org)
Date: 02/28/05 

Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 20:39:47 +0100

"tomstdenis@gmail.com" <tomstdenis@gmail.com> writes:

> W. Dale Hall wrote:
>> jstevh@msn.com wrote:
>> > Nora Baron wrote:
>> > <deleted>
>> >
>> >> As in many other instances he has his own nonstandard definition
>> >>of 'liar'. A 'liar' is someone who disagrees with James Harris.
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > Sigh. Here's why I call "Nora Baron" a serial liar.
>> >
>> > For some years this poster has obsessively replied to my posts, and
> I
>> > noticed a while back that when I explained ideas out carefully and
> in
>> > detail in reply, this poster would just ignore the facts, no matter
> how
>> > often I explained or how carefully I stepped through.
>> >
>>
>> With the exception of having applied the "takes one to know one"
>
> STOP ... FEEDING ... THE ... TROLL.

Oh. Now you're back admonishing others not to respond to JSH.

And tomorrow, I reckon you'll respond to JSH.

Why don't you have a good lie-down and decide how to achieve
self-consistency before giving others advice?

Dumbass. 

-- 
Jesse F. Hughes
"Do not click any hyperlinks that you do not trust. Type them in the
Address bar yourself." -- Microsoft gives security advice.