Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done?
From: TGOS (tgos_at_invalid.invalid)
Date: 02/28/05
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Gerry Myerson: "Re: Fourier Expanision"
- Maybe in reply to: Tim Smith: "Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done?"
- Next in thread: gerard46: "Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done?"
- Reply: gerard46: "Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 23:03:41 +0100
On 27 Feb 2005 23:45:09 GMT rusin@vesuvius.math.niu.edu (Dave Rusin)
wrote in comp.programming:
> Combining these guesstimates puts an upper bound well short of 10^68
> for the number of humans there will ever be, and the hypotheses necessary
> to get anywhere close to that are frankly ridiculous. If every person
> were assigned a 100-digit number there would never, ever be need to
> have duplicate numbers.
Maybe, but now assign the numbers uniquely, without any dupes and
without recording anywhere which numbers you already assigned. Not easy
;)
-- TGOS
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Gerry Myerson: "Re: Fourier Expanision"
- Maybe in reply to: Tim Smith: "Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done?"
- Next in thread: gerard46: "Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done?"
- Reply: gerard46: "Re: [XPOST] A unique number for every "person" - can it be done?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|