Re: an true information theory
examachine_at_gmail.com
Date: 03/01/05
- Next message: Dr.Ruud: "Re: Finding the point of reflection on a plane"
- Previous message: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: an true information theory"
- Maybe in reply to: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: an true information theory"
- Next in thread: Lt. Kizhe Catson: "Re: an true information theory"
- Reply: Lt. Kizhe Catson: "Re: an true information theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 1 Mar 2005 03:18:55 -0800
R. Baldwin wrote:
> Stephen Harris:
> > You, Eray, are too stupid to examine the merits of any topic.
> > You, Eray, are the epitome of low-information discussion.
> > You are stupid. You are uneducated. You are arrogant and can't
read.
>
> Was this really necessary?
Well, I think it's kind of unfortunate that Stephen resorts to these
behaviors. We had once a disagreement on a subject he wasn't well
informed in (see Misunderstanding of Computability thread on sci.math),
as a matter of fact he seemed to catch up with the subject several
years later (and I was glad to see that), but perhaps he is too young
or aggravated to understand that disagreements are part of every
discussion. Too bad he's got a personal grudge, I did find some of his
posts on the mark.
On the other hand, I would like to ask the mods on talk.origins: how do
you let this kind of abuse pass through? Likes of James Harris and Glen
Sizemore keep swearing on sci.math and comp.ai.philosophy, but I think
it's not good that such infantile behavior as Stephen Harris's is
permitted on a moderated newsgroup.
Regards,
-- Eray
- Next message: Dr.Ruud: "Re: Finding the point of reflection on a plane"
- Previous message: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: an true information theory"
- Maybe in reply to: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: an true information theory"
- Next in thread: Lt. Kizhe Catson: "Re: an true information theory"
- Reply: Lt. Kizhe Catson: "Re: an true information theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|