Re: Convergence of continuous function
From: David C. Ullrich (ullrich_at_math.okstate.edu)
Date: 03/01/05
- Next message: David C. Ullrich: "Re: logarithm of a set?"
- Previous message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: krill: "Convergence of continuous function"
- Next in thread: Krillqill: "Re: Convergence of continuous function"
- Reply: Krillqill: "Re: Convergence of continuous function"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 10:53:51 -0600
On 1 Mar 2005 07:08:55 -0800, "krill" <krillqill@hotmail.com> wrote:
>When I read Bartle I find the squeeze theorem which said that a
>function is Riemann integrable iff it is a limit of sequences of
>R-integrable function (converges in the sense of Riemann integral).
What does "converges in the sense of Riemann integral" mean?
>However, I find this theorem somewhat trivial, just as one tell me that
>a continuous function is a limit of sequences of continuous functions.
That's true or not, depending on what sort of convergence
you're talking about.
>So I would like to ask:
>
>1. Is it true that a function f is R-integrable iff for every e>0,
>there exists two continuous function g,h:[a,b]->R, such that
>
>g(x)<=f(x)<=h(x)
>
>and int(h(x)-g(x),[a,b])<e??
Yes, this is easy to see from the characterization in terms of
upper and lower sums.
>2. If a sequence of continuous function {f_n}, where f_n:[a,b]->R
>converges to f, and f is bounded, is f R-integrable(or equivalently,
>the discontinuity set of f is Lebesgue measure zero?
What sort of convergence do you mean here?
************************
David C. Ullrich
- Next message: David C. Ullrich: "Re: logarithm of a set?"
- Previous message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: krill: "Convergence of continuous function"
- Next in thread: Krillqill: "Re: Convergence of continuous function"
- Reply: Krillqill: "Re: Convergence of continuous function"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|