Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: Lester Zick (lesterDELzick_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 03/01/05
- Next message: Tonico: "Re: Soluble finite groups"
- Previous message: Lt. Kizhe Catson: "Re: an true information theory"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Neil W Rickert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 16:55:31 GMT
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 23:06:26 -0500, "robert j. kolker"
<nowhere@nowhere.net> in comp.ai.philosophy wrote:
>Neil W Rickert wrote:
>> I gave some math formulas several postings back in this subthread.
>
>You asked Zick for a formula?
>
>Yoda says: Do not your breath hold, Young Neil, until a formula Zick
>gives. Purple will you turn.
You lie like a flatfish, Bob. I gave you the formula for Planck's
constant and you are too stupid or stupified for words.
On the other hand, Bob, I can show evidence of contradiction between
omnidirectionality of the cosmic red shift and directionality implied
by spatial and temporal metric eccentricity that satisfies empirical
standards of falsification. Of course if you can show equations that
just assume spatial and temporal metric concentricity, that puts you
at the center of a rather medieval universe.
Regards - Lester
- Next message: Tonico: "Re: Soluble finite groups"
- Previous message: Lt. Kizhe Catson: "Re: an true information theory"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Neil W Rickert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
