Re: an true information theory

From: Stephen Harris (cyberguard1048-usenet_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 03/01/05 

Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 18:39:26 GMT

"Daryl McCullough" <stevendaryl3016@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:d024pm015te@drn.newsguy.com...
> Stephen Harris says...
>
>>>> You, Eray, are too stupid to examine the merits of any topic.
>>>> You, Eray, are the epitome of low-information discussion.
>>>> You are stupid. You are uneducated. You are arrogant and can't read.
>>>
>>> Was this really necessary?
>>>
>>> [snip rest]
>>
>>Yes, it is a public service announcement.
>
> No, it's not. Explain how it is a service to anyone. Either
> people already agree with you (in which case, your announcement
> was redundant) or else they don't (in which case, your announcement
> makes people more angry at you than at Eray).
>

There are another class of people who are not aware
that Eray is mentally ill stupid degenerate crackpot.
People fee free to make crank alerts all the time.
For instance |-|erc on sci.logic who is far more innocuous.

Eray has a history of profaning my posts with completely
irrelevant nonsense disguised as intelligent comments. He
intended to irritte with that stupid filth he wrote about
Prof. John Case, which was a completely manufactured
lying criticism. I will not tolerate him. I will not tolerate
anyone who thinks I should tolerate him.

> It amazes me how people can rationalize rudeness, how people
> can convince themselves that they are performing a service
> when they are actually making the world a little worse, a
> little nastier.
>

Just what then is the purpose of your post?? Isn't your post
a thinly diguised suggestion that I adopt your ethical standards?
I find that rude, offensive and nasty. It is somehow Ok, if you
do it, if it is your sensibilities which are offended, then you have
the right to complain. I have the right to defend myself from
evil, malicious sophist attacks, the way I see fit, not the way
you see fit. I have no interest in your immature moral pretences
that I endure abuse in order to buffer your comfort zone. You
may look at this superficially polite post by Eray:

>> Dear Stephen and John,
>>
>> I would be honored if both of you would be humble enough to present
>> your views on a 'generalized mathematical theory of meaning' on
>> ai-philosophy. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy

I look at that invitation in light of the history of having already
killfiled
Eray and him evading that measure. I have no use for your scumbag
moral scheme, which reminds me of the collaboration of Chamberlain.

If you want to do something constructive, read the quote by
Prof. Case and justify Eray's critique of it. You will not be able to
do that. What I realize was that the post was deliberately malicious.

If you want to do something more constuctive grow up and realize
that advice about moral behavior is not appreciated unless it is
solicited. You think you have the right to address this issue because
you were fouled first and you are responding to it. I am exercising
the same option because Eray committed the foul. I will do that
the way I think is most effective, I didn't ask your opinion nor
do I think your post is polite because you didn't use the word stupid.

Mind your own business. If you think you are minding your own
business, then you do it your way and I will do it my way. You
will find it a useless effort to presume to tell me to mind my business
in the way you mind yours.

> --
> Daryl McCullough
> Ithaca, NY
>

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Neural netss (was Re: death of the mind.)
    ... let me give you an image to hold in your mind. ... With discrete computation. ... to what can be known about matter. ... Eray Ozkural ...
    (sci.cognitive)
  • Re: death of the mind.
    ... In article, Eray ... Ozkural exa writes ... >rather than a computation which the computer scientists know better. ... imaginative ideas about "the mind" have such a poor grasp of behavioural ...
    (sci.cognitive)