Re: an true information theory
From: Stephen Harris (cyberguard1048-usenet_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 03/01/05
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Lt. Kizhe Catson: "Re: an true information theory"
- Next in thread: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: an true information theory"
- Reply: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: an true information theory"
- Reply: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: an true information theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 19:39:50 GMT
"Lt. Kizhe Catson" <lt.kizhe@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:42249CDA.90203@gmail.com...
> examachine@gmail.com wrote:
>
> [snip]
>> On the other hand, I would like to ask the mods on talk.origins: how do
>> you let this kind of abuse pass through? Likes of James Harris and Glen
> [snip]
>
> t.o is not moderated by a human, filtering out verbally abusive posts.
> It is moderated by a 'bot, which filters out excessive cross-posts, and
> cross-posts to certain other groups. There is (by the terms of the
> original moderation RFD) no restriction on content. Look for the
> monthly-posted Moderation FAQ, or find it at www.ediacar.org.
>
> -- Kizhe
>
>
This is just another of Eray's stupied lies. Here he pretends to a lack
of knowledge about how this 'kind of abuse' passes through.
It would seem to me, that if Eray really didn't understand how such
abuse passes through, then he would have consider his following
post non-abusive ... or he does realize why abusive posts occur and
he is lying again. So to consider the following post non-abusive I
think the requirement is mental illness. Or he is lying, or both.
Eray Ozkural: "Glen has no idea what he is talking about, he is a fucking
idiot just like you!
Eray: I don't care about teaching Glen anything, he is an incompetent
mindless rat, why should I even try? He won't understand a thing! Look
at all the nonsense he speaks of neuroscience and computer science!
The guy is an imbecile! And so are you!
Get out of here you lamers!
Eray Ozkural: You are the USENET fuckwit
#1, up there in the crackpots list together with David Longley and
following you two Arthur T. Murray. And besides, you are the single
most abusive person on USENET, not me.
You are insanely confused. You don't even realize that you deserve
such response! As I said, you deserve insults and torments till the
end of your unnecessary life. You are nothing. Showing that I insulted
you does no harm to me, you are only an ignorant, foolish troll who
does nothing but disrupt the course of discussion on this group. You
have single-handedly cut down the signal-to-noise ratio to a quarter,
you fucking ***. Why do you complain when your own style of
argumentation is used against you?"
SH: If there were moderators, Eray would not have been allowed to post the
above quote. If there were moderators of content, Eray's mentally ill,
malignant, stupid ignorance which generated the criticism of Prof. Case's
Colt article would have been filtered out. He had the nerve to complain
about the degradation of comp.ai.philosophy after he contributed
significantly to its decline. Then he has the nerve to invite somebody who
has killfiled him to contribute to the forum he has founded to replace c.a.p
which he has helped to ruin.
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Lt. Kizhe Catson: "Re: an true information theory"
- Next in thread: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: an true information theory"
- Reply: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: an true information theory"
- Reply: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: an true information theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]