Re: an true information theory
From: Stephen Harris (cyberguard1048-usenet_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 03/02/05
- Next message: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Daryl McCullough: "Re: an true information theory"
- In reply to: Daryl McCullough: "Re: an true information theory"
- Next in thread: Daryl McCullough: "Re: an true information theory"
- Reply: Daryl McCullough: "Re: an true information theory"
- Reply: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: an true information theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 02:30:01 GMT
"Daryl McCullough" <stevendaryl3016@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:d024pm015te@drn.newsguy.com...
> Stephen Harris says...
>
>>>> You, Eray, are too stupid to examine the merits of any topic.
>>>> You, Eray, are the epitome of low-information discussion.
>>>> You are stupid. You are uneducated. You are arrogant and can't
>>>> >>>>read.
>>>
> It amazes me how people can rationalize rudeness, how people
> can convince themselves that they are performing a service
> when they are actually making the world a little worse, a
> little nastier.
>
> --
> Daryl McCullough
> Ithaca, NY
>
I did not make an angry response. It was quite deliberate.
The mistake I made was waiting as long as I did, which I regret.
Be assured I will persecute that worthless filth and the phony
intelligentsia which harbors that arrogant punk refuge.
I am going to do my best to illuminate some small section
of blackness that feeds off and festers in the heart of Usenet.
- Next message: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Daryl McCullough: "Re: an true information theory"
- In reply to: Daryl McCullough: "Re: an true information theory"
- Next in thread: Daryl McCullough: "Re: an true information theory"
- Reply: Daryl McCullough: "Re: an true information theory"
- Reply: examachine_at_gmail.com: "Re: an true information theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|