Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z
From: Lee Rudolph (lrudolph_at_panix.com)
Date: 03/29/05
- Next message: mhochster_at_gmail.com: "Re: Attacking my algebraic integer work"
- Previous message: Nora Baron: "Re: Attacking my algebraic integer work"
- In reply to: Dave Seaman: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Next in thread: aeo6: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 28 Mar 2005 20:43:40 -0500
Dave Seaman <dseaman@no.such.host> writes:
>That's not what bijections are about. Why is it that you are unable to
>argue against what cardinality actually means, and have to make up phony
>meanings instead? Does the term "straw man" mean anything to you?
This is the rustling strawman debate?
Lee Rudolph
- Next message: mhochster_at_gmail.com: "Re: Attacking my algebraic integer work"
- Previous message: Nora Baron: "Re: Attacking my algebraic integer work"
- In reply to: Dave Seaman: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Next in thread: aeo6: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]