Toplologies of the Hilbert cube
From: Stephen J. Herschkorn (sjherschko_at_netscape.net)
Date: 03/29/05
- Next message: Timothy Little: "Re: An Interesting Problem"
- Previous message: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Next in thread: William Elliot: "Re: Toplologies of the Hilbert cube"
- Reply: William Elliot: "Re: Toplologies of the Hilbert cube"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 03:30:03 -0500
I am reviewing general topology on my own, and, as a solution to an
exercise in Munkres, I came to the following conclusion:
The product, uniform, and ell-2 toplogy on the Hilbert cube are equal.
The box topology on the Hilbert cube is finer that this.
I am 99% sure of my proof, but I am looking for verification of this
result. Is my conclusion correct?
Details:
The uniform topology on R^N is that generated by the metric d(x, y) =
sup(n, min(|x_n - y_n|, 1)).
The box topology on R^N is that for which the collection of all
infinite products of open intervals is a basis.
Let L the set of all square-summable sequences in R. L is a subset
of R^N. The ell-2 metric determines a topology on L.
H = product (n in N, [0, 1/(n+1)]). H is called the Hilbert cube. H
is a subset of L. Thus, as a subspace, it can have any one of the four
topologies.
-- Stephen J. Herschkorn sjherschko@netscape.net
- Next message: Timothy Little: "Re: An Interesting Problem"
- Previous message: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Next in thread: William Elliot: "Re: Toplologies of the Hilbert cube"
- Reply: William Elliot: "Re: Toplologies of the Hilbert cube"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|