Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z
From: Albert Wagner (albertwagner_at_cox.net)
Date: 03/29/05
- Next message: Albert Wagner: "Re: "Number" of elements; was: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Previous message: sherifffruitfly_at_gmail.com: "Re: Why 0/0 is meaningless?"
- In reply to: Randy Poe: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Next in thread: aeo6: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Reply: aeo6: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:14:37 -0600
Randy Poe wrote:
<snip>
You are still crossposting to sci.philosophy.meta. Are you
trolling? Or trying to start a flame war?
-- "I know that most men, including those at ease with problems of the greatest complexity, can seldom accept even the simplest and most obvious truth if it be such as would oblige them to admit the falsity of conclusions which they have delighted in explaining to colleagues, which they have proudly taught to others, and which they have woven, thread by thread, into the fabric of their lives." - -- Tolstoy
- Next message: Albert Wagner: "Re: "Number" of elements; was: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Previous message: sherifffruitfly_at_gmail.com: "Re: Why 0/0 is meaningless?"
- In reply to: Randy Poe: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Next in thread: aeo6: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Reply: aeo6: "Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|