Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z

From: Randy Poe (poespam-trap_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 03/29/05 

Date: 29 Mar 2005 13:37:50 -0800

Tony Orlow (aeo6) wrote:
> Jesse F. Hughes said:
> > Tony Orlow (aeo6) <aeo6@cornell.edu> writes:
> >
> > > No, in lexicographical terms, set A is a proper superset of set
B,
> > > but you have changed the order, thereby breaking the mappings
> > > between the number sets and the string sets. This violates
Occam's
> > > Axiom in Bigulosity Theory. Sorry.
> >
> > You are the only person I know that builds strange, convoluted
> > "theories" of set size that amount to, "for every comparison, ask
> > Tony," and then has the balls to invoke Occam's name to support
your
> > bizarre claims.
> >
> >
> Well, doesn;t that make me unique!! :D

There is precedent. James Harris uses the same operational
definition for his object ring. If you want to know if it's
an object, ask James.

            - Randy

Relevant Pages

  • Re: jstevh@msn.com, starting threads but never replying? 8-D
    ... one thing seems a bit strange ... ... There are people who have obsessively tracked my posts for years, ... replying and replying and replying, and they clog up threads I create, ... James Harris ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: JSH: Now a change
    ... jstevh@msn.com (James Harris) writes: ... So there are transcendental numbers in the object ring? ... "We want a single platform. ... operating system wars. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: jstevh@msn.com, starting threads but never replying? 8-D
    ... > James Harris, ... > As a casual observer, one thing seems a bit strange ... ... and tell King George we'll pay no taxes" ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Object ring, still fiddling with it
    ... James Harris wrote: ... > definition for the object ring, so I've fiddled with it yet again. ... > are coprime in the ring of integers, and where given a member x there ... > must exist a nonzero member y and a member z such that xy is an ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Object ring: corrected definition
    ... On 24 Jun 2004, James Harris wrote: ... >Oh, that was a bogus addition, the xz + y thing. ... don't want transcendental numbers to be in an object ring, ... then from the various posts of Winter, Magidin and KRamsey we ...
    (sci.math)