Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: Lester Zick (lesterDELzick_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 03/03/05
- Next message: GR_GR: "Re: Problem fitting a curve"
- Previous message: gswork_at_mailcity.com: "Re: X-No-archive considered harmful"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 15:18:29 GMT
On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 16:34:02 -0500, "robert j. kolker"
<nowhere@nowhere.net> in comp.ai.philosophy wrote:
>Lester Zick wrote:
>
>>
>> I offer a universal predicate and particle spin regression through
>> the radial integral of radial velocity in terms of Planck's constant
>
>*** that ***. Where is the experimental support? Give a reference to
>actually experiments done and verified or shut up.
Particle spin, Bob, unless you have some kind of empirical support to
offer for 1+1=2 apart from examples of addition. Nice commentary
though, Bob. Real fucking erudite.
Regards - Lester
- Next message: GR_GR: "Re: Problem fitting a curve"
- Previous message: gswork_at_mailcity.com: "Re: X-No-archive considered harmful"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]