Re: Reverse engineering surrogate factoring
From: ošin (ošin_at_ragnarok.com)
Date: 03/03/05
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Reverse engineering surrogate factoring"
- Next in thread: C. Bond: "Re: Reverse engineering surrogate factoring"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 07:27:12 -0800
> There are three possibilities:
>
> 1. The prime factors are all related in some way to M
>
> 2. The prime factors are all related to the particular prime factor of
> M that you are using, so it's crap.
>
> 3. There is no relationship between the prime factors of the
> denominator of y besides the prime factor of M that you are using.
>
> If 1. then there should be some way to generalize to a full, perfect
> algorithm.
What is a perfect algorithm? You mean one that always works and terminates
in poly-time? If that is what you mean, you have never proved this, which
makes you a liar. If it is not what you mean, then it is crap, and again,
you are a liar..
> If 2. then bad news, surrogate factoring needs to know the prime
> factor of M already to work consistently, so it's crap.
And if it is crap that means that you are a liar.
> If 3. then surrogate factoring provides the first known perfect random
> number generator.
That is nonsense. You have been told many times that any algorithm executing
on a deterministic computer cannot generate random numbers. You are an
idiot.
> So you have 1., 2. or 3., and the person who can crack the code, if
> it's 1., can basically factor anything.
But how fast? There are already plenty of ways to factor anything given
enough time.
> If it's 2. then that's just
> it, surrogate factoring can't work. If it's 3. then it *may* still
> work, but heavily probabilistically, but the world has its first
> perfect random number generator outside of quantum.
No idiot...
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Reverse engineering surrogate factoring"
- Next in thread: C. Bond: "Re: Reverse engineering surrogate factoring"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
