Re: Counting primes, and lying mathematicians
From: karllarc (karllarc_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 03/04/05
- Next message: Virgil: "Re: Counting primes, and lying mathematicians"
- Previous message: karllarc: "Re: Prime counting, a real test"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Counting primes, and lying mathematicians"
- Next in thread: Virgil: "Re: Counting primes, and lying mathematicians"
- Reply: Virgil: "Re: Counting primes, and lying mathematicians"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 3 Mar 2005 20:33:05 -0800
"My prime counting function can find primes numbers on its own as it
recurses, which has NEVER been seen before in mathematics with a "prime
counting function".
Every other recursive method for counting primes known has needed to be
to given a list of primes.
That is just a fact". James Harris
What about trial by division. It doesn't use a list of primes. So much
for your "facts".
- Next message: Virgil: "Re: Counting primes, and lying mathematicians"
- Previous message: karllarc: "Re: Prime counting, a real test"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Counting primes, and lying mathematicians"
- Next in thread: Virgil: "Re: Counting primes, and lying mathematicians"
- Reply: Virgil: "Re: Counting primes, and lying mathematicians"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|