Re: Counting primes, and lying mathematicians
From: Wayne Brown (fwbrown_at_bellsouth.net)
Date: 03/04/05
- Next message: Dave Rusin: "Re: Changes in USENET archives (Was Re: Chain of strictly decreasing closed sets is countable)"
- Previous message: ošin: "Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Counting primes, and lying mathematicians"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 22:17:18 GMT
jstevh@msn.com wrote:
>
> Who do you think you are?
He's not James Harris, which makes him better than you. (The same is
true of everyone else on Earth -- except, of course, you.)
--
Wayne Brown (HPCC #1104) | "When your tail's in a crack, you improvise
fwbrown@bellsouth.net | if you're good enough. Otherwise you give
| your pelt to the trapper."
"e^(i*pi) = -1" -- Euler | -- John Myers Myers, "Silverlock"
- Next message: Dave Rusin: "Re: Changes in USENET archives (Was Re: Chain of strictly decreasing closed sets is countable)"
- Previous message: ošin: "Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "Re: Counting primes, and lying mathematicians"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
