Re: On the cardinal of the Cantor set
From: Dave Seaman (dseaman_at_no.such.host)
Date: 03/05/05
- Next message: David Moran: "Re: JSH: PrimeCountH.java"
- Previous message: David Eather: "Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring"
- In reply to: José Carlos Santos: "Re: On the cardinal of the Cantor set"
- Next in thread: Dave L. Renfro: "Re: On the cardinal of the Cantor set"
- Reply: Dave L. Renfro: "Re: On the cardinal of the Cantor set"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 14:26:21 +0000 (UTC)
On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 08:01:53 +0000, José Carlos Santos wrote:
> Dave Seaman wrote:
> No, my question is: who was the first person who used expressing real
> numbers in the bases 2 and 3 in order to prove that the Cantor set has
> the same cardinal as the set of real numbers.
>From what I have seen, Cantor considered perfect aggregates, but he did
not give any special attention to the middle-thirds version of that set.
-- Dave Seaman Judge Yohn's mistakes revealed in Mumia Abu-Jamal ruling. <http://www.commoncouragepress.com/index.cfm?action=book&bookid=228>
- Next message: David Moran: "Re: JSH: PrimeCountH.java"
- Previous message: David Eather: "Re: Simple answer, surrogate factoring"
- In reply to: José Carlos Santos: "Re: On the cardinal of the Cantor set"
- Next in thread: Dave L. Renfro: "Re: On the cardinal of the Cantor set"
- Reply: Dave L. Renfro: "Re: On the cardinal of the Cantor set"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
