Re: Possible proof of Gabriel's Theorem?
From: Jason (logamath_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 03/07/05
- Next message: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Jim Spriggs: "Re: Platonism"
- In reply to: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: Possible proof of Gabriel's Theorem?"
- Next in thread: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: Possible proof of Gabriel's Theorem?"
- Reply: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: Possible proof of Gabriel's Theorem?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 7 Mar 2005 09:31:19 -0800
To what do I owe this pleasure? :-) Are you the famous JSH?
> You got a curious way of expressing yourself.
Well, considering all the nonsense and irrelevant junk that's posted on
this forum, it's a miracle that I am even able to *express* myself. Ha,
ha.
I have a college math professor in this forum who is bent on
reprimanding me and trolls from as far as France mouthing off at me! So
forgive me if I am sometimes unable to express myself the way I should.
Unfortunately, I know nothing about surrogate factoring so can't
comment on your stuff.
Ullrich and the others will be having a good laugh at this post. Some
possible reactions might be:
"Giggle, a meeting/mating of fools..."
OR
"You said it, I didn't have to..."
OR
"See, I told you: Wells and Hughes are one and the same. Finally..."
OR
"Wells finally flipped over..."
The biggest and nastiest troll is Oliver! I think this miserable life
form is studying psychotherapy with a major in BS(bull shit). So when
he gets his BS, it will be a double BS! I am targeting Ullrich because
I think if he tries, he might understand it - maybe better than I do -
but I am running out of hope fast. I have very little hope for all the
others. Ed Hook initially seemed to be quite knowledgeable but then
gave up me. Yan (from MIT) decided I was not worth the effort. Rodgers
quit after he got some insight into my character and realized I wasn't
such a bad guy. But he is still having a good laugh at me. :-) Oh
well,....
Now I am studying for my Phd in math. Only module I need to complete
now is the Analysis of 6-packs: I decided that the more I drink, the
more eveyone on this forum begins to make sense. However, drinking a
6-pack will result in me losing my 6-pack and not drinking it, means I
will never have a beer belly and thus shall never be awarded my Phd.
Ha, ha. So it's quite a dilemma as you realize I am sure.
I wonder what Ullrich looks like because he appeared to be annoyed at
one post in which I vilified Chapman's personal hygiene and appearance.
The last name implies germanic ancestry. Think Ullrich may be related
to the great Weierstrass somewhere down the line? Ha, ha.
So glad to have made your acquaintance Mr. Hughes. I wish you well in
your endeavours. I am proud to be associated with you and gabriel!
Here's to the revolution!
Jason Wells
Okay, I don't tell jokes ever but now will be the first time:
HAve you heard this one? What's a BS, MS and PHd stand for ?
BS - Bull Shit
MS - More Shit
PHd - Piled higher and deeper.
Okay, so it's probably an old slapstick joke. I ask your forgiveness. I
never was good at telling jokes (and no doubt someone will say I was
never good at math either or I told you so). So please trolls, spare me
the comments. I would like to keep this thread from getting any worse.
otherwise I will just have to start a new one and god knows, some of
you trolls will have a multiple fit! Ha, ha.
- Next message: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Jim Spriggs: "Re: Platonism"
- In reply to: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: Possible proof of Gabriel's Theorem?"
- Next in thread: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: Possible proof of Gabriel's Theorem?"
- Reply: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: Possible proof of Gabriel's Theorem?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
