Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: Albert Wagner (albertwagner_at_cox.net)
Date: 03/08/05
- Next message: Keith A. Lewis: "Re: Does lim (1/a) x^(a-1) tend to ln(x) when a tends to 0 ?"
- Previous message: W. Mueckenheim: "Re: abundance of irrationals!)"
- In reply to: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:20:56 -0600
Tony Orlow (aeo6) wrote:
<snip>
> It's not an empirical discussion, Bob, but a logical one with
> theological implications. I guess perhaps, given my proclivities,
> experiences and the current situation, I must be compelled to discuss
> it. LOL :)
Yes, that's true. As a Southern Baptist, God's predestination is
vital to your soul. To accept free-will means that you must
accept moral responsibility for your own actions, which you
cannot do.
-- "I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be based on the field concept, i. e., on continuous structures. In that case nothing remains of my entire castle in the air, gravitation theory included, [and of] the rest of modern physics." -- Albert Einstein in a 1954 letter to Michele Besso.
- Next message: Keith A. Lewis: "Re: Does lim (1/a) x^(a-1) tend to ln(x) when a tends to 0 ?"
- Previous message: W. Mueckenheim: "Re: abundance of irrationals!)"
- In reply to: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
