Re: JSH: Big collapse on surrogate factoring
From: Gib Bogle (bogle_at_ihug.too.much.spam.co.nz)
Date: 03/10/05
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "JSH: Big collapse on surrogate factoring"
- Next in thread: Angus Rodgers: "Re: JSH: Big collapse on surrogate factoring"
- Reply: Angus Rodgers: "Re: JSH: Big collapse on surrogate factoring"
- Reply: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: JSH: Big collapse on surrogate factoring"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 08:52:15 +1300
jstevh@msn.com wrote:
> As far as I'm concerned I've just had a massive collapse in terms of
> getting surrogate factoring working, with a recent result that
> indicates you kind of need to know the factors of M ahead of time to
> guarantee a factorization.
I predict that this JSH won't stick around long, and soon the old JSH
will be back with his grandiose claims.
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "JSH: Big collapse on surrogate factoring"
- Next in thread: Angus Rodgers: "Re: JSH: Big collapse on surrogate factoring"
- Reply: Angus Rodgers: "Re: JSH: Big collapse on surrogate factoring"
- Reply: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: JSH: Big collapse on surrogate factoring"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading