Re: JSH: Big collapse on surrogate factoring
From: David Ames (worldrecord_at_juno.com)
Date: 03/12/05
- Next message: W. Mueckenheim: "Re: abundance of irrationals!)"
- Previous message: W. Mueckenheim: "Re: abundance of irrationals!)"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "JSH: Big collapse on surrogate factoring"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 12 Mar 2005 05:28:26 -0800
jstevh@msn.com wrote:
> As far as I'm concerned I've just had a massive collapse in terms of
> getting surrogate factoring working, with a recent result that
> indicates you kind of need to know the factors of M ahead of time to
> guarantee a factorization.
>
> Yuck.
>
Oh, don't toss that result already. When I took Number Theory back in
'64, the professor said there was a way to
determine the nth prime number; however, it required prior knowledge of
(n + k) primes. So, by analogy, your result may
be a useful one.
David Ames
- Next message: W. Mueckenheim: "Re: abundance of irrationals!)"
- Previous message: W. Mueckenheim: "Re: abundance of irrationals!)"
- In reply to: jstevh_at_msn.com: "JSH: Big collapse on surrogate factoring"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
